Love, attract, together with inhibition off advice from romantic choices- October 18, 2023
Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, M. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Advancement and you may Human Decisions, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The area out of attachment during the people mating. Report on General Therapy, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, An excellent. (2002). Web sites paradox reviewed. Diary off Societal Products, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Meters., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Websites contradiction: A personal technical you to minimizes social engagement and https://brightwomen.net/da/varme-kinesiske-kvinder/ you may emotional well-are? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, Roentgen.Meters., & Sphere, J. Meters. (2001). Amount, time, and duration of marriages and you may divorces. Newest Society Records, 70-80, (Washington, DC: You.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional research from intimacy, appeal, and partnership: Investigations this new assumptions of triangular principle out of love. Mental Account, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step 3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Perception finest regarding starting tough: Public reviews within this intimate relationship. Log of Identification and you can Societal Psychology, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A good., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: This new implicit knowledge of personal competition. Diary regarding Identification and you may Social Therapy, 97(1), 74–87.
A beneficial. (2001)mitment and you will relationship repairs elements
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A good., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention to glamorous choices: The newest changed mindset away from relationships maintenance. Evolution and Human Conclusion, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential studies away from dispute and you will accord from inside the upset and you can nondistressed marital couples. Diary from Consulting and Clinical Mindset, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., Gleason, M. J. (2002). Relationships development on the web: What’s the large attraction? Diary out-of Societal Points, 58(1), 9–29.
The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization plus the design out of pleasure in romantic matchmaking
Neff, L. An excellent., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-review intentions from inside the intimate relationship: A type of international enhancement and you may certain confirmation. In the P. Noller & J. A beneficial. Feeney (Eds.), Information ents throughout the study of couple communication (pp. 32–58). Ny, NY: Cambridge College Press.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the client-specialist bond from contact lens away from accessory idea. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Habit, Training, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The latest social keeping track of system: Enhanced susceptibility in order to societal signs as a transformative reaction to societal different. Within the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The brand new public outcast: Ostracism, public different, rejection, and you may intimidation (pp. 213–226). Nyc, NY: Mindset Push.
Enter, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Around the globe and you can certain relational habits about exposure to public connections. Log off Character and you will Public Mindset, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An excellent., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you may recommendations trying to inside personal dating. Personality and you will Societal Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you may particular connection representations in the adulthood: Is there a love?. Log From Social And private Relationships, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Elizabeth., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. From inside the J. Harvey & A. Wenzel (Eds.), Close romantic relationship: Restoration and you may improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An effective. D. (2000). Projection personally impact among spouses due to the fact a purpose of the fresh new resemblance inside their common skills. Character And you can Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Effects of salience out-of extrinsic perks to the taste and you can enjoying. Diary out-of Personality and you will Societal Psychology, 38(3), 453–460.